<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Lessons from U.S. allies in security cooperation with third countries</title>
    <subTitle>the cases of Australia, France, and the United Kingdom</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Moroney, Jennifer D. P.</namePart>
    <namePart type="date">1973-</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Project Air Force (U.S.)</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>United States</namePart>
    <namePart>Air Force.</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Rand Corporation</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>ebrary, Inc</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">bibliography</genre>
  <genre authority="local">Electronic books.</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">cau</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Santa Monica, Calif</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>RAND</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2011</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <form authority="gmd">electronic resource</form>
    <extent>xxiii, 129 p. : ill. (some col.).</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Like the U.S. Air Force, many U.S. allies work with partner countries on security matters, sometimes even with the same partners, but on a smaller scale. But how, where, and why do these allies engage the same countries? Would working together in particular areas be worthwhile or viable and can specific lessons be learned from their experiences, for example, in the areas of planning, resourcing and assessments? This report explores these questions by examining both the positive aspects and the challenges of the security cooperation approaches of three U.S. allies, Australia, France, and the United Kingdom. These three capable allies are experienced in working with civilian counterparts and benefit from higher-level departmental guidance. They generally do so with relatively small budgets, leading them to learn to economize, pool resources, and take advantage of joint and interagency planning. These strategies can inform current U.S. thinking on security cooperation. They also suggest venues for further collaboration between allies, particularly in the three key areas of staff talks, exercises, and training followed by exercises --</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Jennifer D.P. Moroney ... [et al.].</note>
  <note>"TR-972-AF"--P. [4] of cover.</note>
  <note>"Prepared for the United States Air Force."</note>
  <note>"Project Air Force."</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references (p. 121-129).</note>
  <note>Electronic reproduction. Palo Alto, Calif. : ebrary, 2012. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries.</note>
  <subject>
    <geographicCode authority="marcgac">u-at---</geographicCode>
    <geographicCode authority="marcgac">e-fr---</geographicCode>
    <geographicCode authority="marcgac">e-uk---</geographicCode>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>National security</topic>
    <topic>International cooperation</topic>
    <topic>Case studies</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Military policy</topic>
    <topic>Case studies</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <geographic>Australia</geographic>
    <topic>Military relations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <geographic>France</geographic>
    <topic>Military relations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <geographic>Great Britain</geographic>
    <topic>Military relations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <geographic>United States</geographic>
    <topic>Military relations</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">UA870 .L47 2011eb</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">355/.031</classification>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Technical report (Rand Corporation)</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="lccn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="uri">http://site.ebrary.com/lib/rucke/Doc?id=10521987</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://site.ebrary.com/lib/rucke/Doc?id=10521987</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">CaPaEBR</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">110902</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="CaPaEBR">ebr10521987</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
