| 000 | 05468nam a2200469 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ebr10818055 | ||
| 003 | CaPaEBR | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 121116s2012 caua ob 000 0 eng|d | ||
| 020 | _z9780833076786 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | _a9780833076793 (e-book) | ||
| 040 |
_aCaPaEBR _beng _erda _epn _cCaPaEBR |
||
| 043 | _an-us--- | ||
| 050 | 1 | 4 |
_aU163 _b.L518 2012eb |
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a358.4/141 _223 |
| 100 | 1 | _aLibicki, Martin C. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCrisis and escalation in cyberspace / _cMartin C. Libicki. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aSanta Monica, CA : _bRAND, Project Air Force, _c2012. |
|
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (199 pages) : _billustrations (some color) |
||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _a"Prepared for the United States Air Force." | ||
| 500 | _a"Approved for public release; distribution unlimited." | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 163-172). | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aAvoiding crises by creating norms -- Narratives, dialogues, and signaling -- Escalation management -- Strategic stability -- Conclusions and recommendations for the Air Force -- Introduction -- Some hypothetical crises -- Mutual mistrust is likely to characterize a cyber crisis -- States may have room for maneuver in a cyber crisis -- A note on methodology -- Purpose and organization -- Avoiding crises by creating norms -- What kind of norms might be useful? -- Enforce laws against hacking -- Disassociate from freelance hackers -- Discourage commercial espionage -- Be careful about the obligation to suppress cyber traffic -- How do we enforce norms? -- Confidence-building measures -- Norms for victims of cyberattacks -- Norms for war? -- Deception -- Military necessity and collateral damage -- Proportionality -- Reversibility -- Conclusions -- Narratives, dialogue, and signals -- Narratives to promote control -- A narrative framework for cyberspace -- Victimization, attribution, retaliation, and aggression -- Victimization -- Attribution -- Retaliation -- Aggression -- Emollients: narratives to walk back a crisis -- We did nothing -- Well, at least not on our orders -- It was an accident -- This is nothing new -- At least it does not portend anything -- Broader considerations -- Signals -- Ambiguity in signaling -- Signaling resolve -- Signaling that cyber combat is not kinetic combat -- Conclusions -- Escalation management -- Motives for escalation -- Does escalation matter? -- Escalation risks -- Escalation risks in phase -- Escalation risks for contained local conflicts -- Escalation risks for uncontained conflicts -- Managing proxy cyberattacks -- What hidden combatants imply for horizontal escalation -- Managing overt proxy conflict -- The difficulties of tit-for-tat management -- The importance of pre-planning -- Disjunctions among effort, effect, and perception -- Inadvertent escalation -- Escalation into kinetic warfare -- Escalation into economic warfare -- Sub rosa escalation -- Managing the third-party problem -- The need for a clean shot -- Inference and narrative -- Command and control -- Commanders -- Those they command -- Conclusions -- Implications for strategic stability -- Translating sources of cold war instability to cyberspace -- What influence can cyberwar have if nuclear weapons exist? -- Can cyberwar disarm another state's nuclear capabilities? -- Can cyberwar disarm another states cyberwarriors? -- Does cyberwar lend itself to alert-reaction cycles? -- Are cyberdefenses inherently destabilizing? -- Would a cyberspace arms races be destabilizing? -- Misperception as a source of crisis -- Side takes great exception to cyberespionage -- Defenses are misinterpreted as preparations for war -- Too much confidence in attribution -- Too much confidence in or fear of pre-emption -- Supposedly risk-free cyberattacks -- Neutrality -- Conclusions -- Can cyber crises be managed? -- A. Distributed denial-of-service attacks -- B. Overt, obvious, and covert cyberattacks and responses -- Can good cyberdefenses discourage attacks? -- Bibliography -- Figures -- Figure 1: Alternative postures for a master cyber narrative -- Figure 2: Sources of imprecision in tit for tat -- Figure 3: An inadvertent path to mutual escalation -- Figure A-1: Configuring networks to limit the damage of DDoS attacks -- Table -- Overt, obvious, and covert cyberattacks and responses. | |
| 588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
| 590 | _aElectronic reproduction. Palo Alto, Calif. : ebrary, 2014. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries. | ||
| 610 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnited States. _bAir Force _xOrganization. |
| 610 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnited States. _bAir Force _xDecision making. |
| 650 | 0 |
_aInformation warfare _zUnited States. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aEscalation (Military science) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aCyberspace _xSecurity measures. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCrisis management _xGovernment policy _zUnited States. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCyberterrorism _xPrevention. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aConflict management. | |
| 655 | 0 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _aLibicki, Martin C. _tCrisis and escalation in cyberspace. _dSanta Monica, CA : RAND, Project Air Force, 2012 _hxxvi, 172 pages ; 23 cm _z9780833076786 _w(DLC) 2012046227 |
| 797 | 2 | _aebrary. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttp://site.ebrary.com/lib/rucke/Doc?id=10818055 _zAn electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| 999 |
_c78415 _d78415 |
||